饾悞饾悡饾悁饾悡饾悇饾悓饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悗饾悈 饾悡饾悋饾悇 饾悞饾悢饾悂饾悅饾悗饾悓饾悓饾悎饾悡饾悡饾悇饾悇 饾悗饾悕 饾悁饾悅饾悅饾悇饾悞饾悞饾悎饾悂饾悎饾悑饾悎饾悡饾悩 饾悗饾悕 饾悂饾悢饾悎饾悑饾悡 饾悇饾悕饾悤饾悎饾悜饾悗饾悕饾悓饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悁饾悕饾悆 饾悡饾悜饾悁饾悕饾悞饾悘饾悗饾悜饾悡饾悁饾悡饾悎饾悗饾悕 饾悜饾悇饾悊饾悁饾悜饾悆饾悎饾悕饾悊 饾悡饾悋饾悇 饾悘饾悁饾悞饾悇饾悗 饾悆饾悇 饾悞饾悡饾悁. 饾悜饾悗饾悞饾悁 饾悎饾悕饾悅饾悎饾悆饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悗饾悕 饾悘饾悁饾悜饾悐饾悎饾悕饾悊 饾悞饾悘饾悁饾悅饾悇饾悞 饾悈饾悗饾悜 饾悘饾悇饾悜饾悞饾悗饾悕饾悞 饾悥饾悎饾悡饾悋 饾悆饾悎饾悞饾悁饾悂饾悎饾悑饾悎饾悡饾悎饾悇饾悞 dated July 09, 2025.

Under the title is the body text that reads:

The 麻豆传媒 Subcommittee on Accessibility on Built Environment and Transportation (SCABET) finds the incident in Paseo De Sta. Rosa, Laguna regarding the denial of parking space to Ms. Maria Ordo帽ez and two (2) persons with disability family members as 鈥渋nsensitive and discriminatory to persons with disabilities and constitute a violation of Batas Pambansa Blg. 344 (BP 344) and RA 7277 or the Magna Carta for Persons with Disabilities鈥�.

The outright denial of available parking space to persons with disabilities upon request without consideration of mobility needs and disability-related concerns is total non-recognition of their inherent dignity and human rights.

Under BP 344 and its Amended Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR), accessible parking spaces are mandated to be inclusive, ensuring safe and convenient access for individuals with mobility limitations, whether due to physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments. BP 344 does not specify any distinction on the type of vehicle allowed to use the allocated persons with disability parking slots therefore, e-tricycle is not prohibited from parking in these areas.

We acknowledge the increasing number of e-tricycle used by persons with disabilities that are affordable and accessible to them. The refusal to allow the use of the Persons with Disability parking slot solely on the basis that the vehicle was an e-tricycle constitutes discrimination and violation to BP 344. Therefore, denying access based on the vehicle type violates the legal protections guaranteed to Persons with disabilities under BP 344.

We strongly call all the Local Government Units (LGUs) to issue ordinance pertaining to accessible parking spaces to support the implementation of the Batas Pambansa 344 ensuring the rights to access of the Persons with Disabilities.

We also urge the Establishments both for private and public use to provide parking spaces for persons with disabilities using any vehicle types.

The committee will prioritize the development of the guidelines on accessibility parking spaces specifically on the designated parking spaces for persons with disabilities and amendment to the Batas Pambansa 344.

This infographic is the 饾悞饾悡饾悁饾悡饾悇饾悓饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悗饾悈 饾悡饾悋饾悇 饾悞饾悢饾悂饾悅饾悗饾悓饾悓饾悎饾悡饾悡饾悇饾悇 饾悗饾悕 饾悁饾悅饾悅饾悇饾悞饾悞饾悎饾悂饾悎饾悑饾悎饾悡饾悩 饾悗饾悕 饾悂饾悢饾悎饾悑饾悡 饾悇饾悕饾悤饾悎饾悜饾悗饾悕饾悓饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悁饾悕饾悆 饾悡饾悜饾悁饾悕饾悞饾悘饾悗饾悜饾悡饾悁饾悡饾悎饾悗饾悕 饾悜饾悇饾悊饾悁饾悜饾悆饾悎饾悕饾悊 饾悡饾悋饾悇 饾悘饾悁饾悞饾悇饾悗 饾悆饾悇 饾悞饾悡饾悁. 饾悜饾悗饾悞饾悁 饾悎饾悕饾悅饾悎饾悆饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悗饾悕 饾悘饾悁饾悜饾悐饾悎饾悕饾悊 饾悞饾悘饾悁饾悅饾悇饾悞 饾悈饾悗饾悜 饾悘饾悇饾悜饾悞饾悗饾悕饾悞 饾悥饾悎饾悡饾悋 饾悆饾悎饾悞饾悁饾悂饾悎饾悑饾悎饾悡饾悎饾悇饾悞. The overall design background color is light beige with red, maroon, and blue accents at the upper right most and bottom left most corners with a thin light brown border and a very light watermark of the 麻豆传媒 logo at the center. At the top center most portion are the 麻豆传媒 logo and Bagong Pilipinas logo. Under it is the title that reads: 饾悞饾悡饾悁饾悡饾悇饾悓饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悗饾悈 饾悡饾悋饾悇 饾悞饾悢饾悂饾悅饾悗饾悓饾悓饾悎饾悡饾悡饾悇饾悇 饾悗饾悕 饾悁饾悅饾悅饾悇饾悞饾悞饾悎饾悂饾悎饾悑饾悎饾悡饾悩 饾悗饾悕 饾悂饾悢饾悎饾悑饾悡 饾悇饾悕饾悤饾悎饾悜饾悗饾悕饾悓饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悁饾悕饾悆 饾悡饾悜饾悁饾悕饾悞饾悘饾悗饾悜饾悡饾悁饾悡饾悎饾悗饾悕 饾悜饾悇饾悊饾悁饾悜饾悆饾悎饾悕饾悊 饾悡饾悋饾悇 饾悘饾悁饾悞饾悇饾悗 饾悆饾悇 饾悞饾悡饾悁. 饾悜饾悗饾悞饾悁 饾悎饾悕饾悅饾悎饾悆饾悇饾悕饾悡 饾悗饾悕 饾悘饾悁饾悜饾悐饾悎饾悕饾悊 饾悞饾悘饾悁饾悅饾悇饾悞 饾悈饾悗饾悜 饾悘饾悇饾悜饾悞饾悗饾悕饾悞 饾悥饾悎饾悡饾悋 饾悆饾悎饾悞饾悁饾悂饾悎饾悑饾悎饾悡饾悎饾悇饾悞 dated July 09, 2025. Under the title is the body text that reads: The 麻豆传媒 Subcommittee on Accessibility on Built Environment and Transportation (SCABET) finds the incident in Paseo De Sta. Rosa, Laguna regarding the denial of parking space to Ms. Maria Ordo帽ez and two (2) persons with disability family members as 鈥渋nsensitive and discriminatory to persons with disabilities and constitute a violation of Batas Pambansa Blg. 344 (BP 344) and RA 7277 or the Magna Carta for Persons with Disabilities鈥�. The outright denial of available parking space to persons with disabilities upon request without consideration of mobility needs and disability-related concerns is total non-recognition of their inherent dignity and human rights. Under BP 344 and its Amended Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR), accessible parking spaces are mandated to be inclusive, ensuring safe and convenient access for individuals with mobility limitations, whether due to physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments. BP 344 does not specify any distinction on the type of vehicle allowed to use the allocated persons with disability parking slots therefore, e-tricycle is not prohibited from parking in these areas. We acknowledge the increasing number of e-tricycle used by persons with disabilities that are affordable and accessible to them. The refusal to allow the use of the Persons with Disability parking slot solely on the basis that the vehicle was an e-tricycle constitutes discrimination and violation to BP 344. Therefore, denying access based on the vehicle type violates the legal protections guaranteed to Persons with disabilities under BP 344. We strongly call all the Local Government Units (LGUs) to issue ordinance pertaining to accessible parking spaces to support the implementation of the Batas Pambansa 344 ensuring the rights to access of the Persons with Disabilities. We also urge the Establishments both for private and public use to provide parking spaces for persons with disabilities using any vehicle types. The committee will prioritize the development of the guidelines on accessibility parking spaces specifically on the designated parking spaces for persons with disabilities and amendment to the Batas Pambansa 344.